- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 350 vs Vega
Kodak Luma 350 vs Nebula Vega
What Luma 350 does better (1) and where Vega wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Luma 350 better than Vega?
- Weight0.73 kg vs 1.5 kg2.1×
Why is Vega better than Luma 350?
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm vs 500 lm+43%
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 350 lm | 500 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | 200″ | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 30 dB |
| Weight | 0.73 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Width | — | 192 mm |
| Height | — | 59 mm |
| Depth | — | 192 mm |
| Colours | White | Black |
