How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 350 vs The Freestyle LSP3

Kodak Luma 350 vs Samsung The Freestyle LSP3

What Luma 350 does better (3) and where The Freestyle LSP3 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 350
Kodak · 2020Luma 350
3 advantages≈ US$400
vs
Samsung The Freestyle LSP3
Samsung · 2022The Freestyle LSP3
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ US$360
Higher score
3.4Picture4.5

Why is Luma 350 better than The Freestyle LSP3?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm vs 230 lm+52%
  2. Largest image size200″ vs 100″2×
  3. Weight0.73 kg vs 0.83 kg+14%

Why is The Freestyle LSP3 better than Luma 350?

  1. Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Kodak Luma 350Kodak Luma 350≈ US$400
Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—DLP
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm230 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—300:1
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10, HLG
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—30″
Largest image size200″100″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—5 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Tizen (Samsung)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlay—Yes
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, Bixby
Internal storage8 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version—1.4
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—50 W
Light source life—20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—30 dB
Weight0.73 kg0.83 kg
Width—104 mm
Height—173 mm
Depth—95 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare