How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 350 vs T2 Max Blue v2

Kodak Luma 350 vs Wanbo T2 Max Blue v2

What Luma 350 does better (4) and where T2 Max Blue v2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 350
Kodak · 2020Luma 350
4 advantages≈ US$400
vs
Wanbo T2 Max Blue v2
Wanbo · 2023T2 Max Blue v2
5.0Score
4 advantages≈ US$390
Higher score
3.4Picture7.3

Why is Luma 350 better than T2 Max Blue v2?

  1. Wi-FiYes · T2 Max Blue v2: No
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 0
  3. Largest image size200″ vs 120″+67%
  4. Weight0.73 kg vs 0.9 kg+23%

Why is T2 Max Blue v2 better than Luma 350?

  1. Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm vs 450 lm+29%
  3. Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  4. Internal storage8 GB vs 16 GB2×
Specifications

Side by side

Kodak Luma 350Kodak Luma 350≈ US$400
Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm450 lm
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.35:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.99 m
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size200″120″
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—6 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Wi-FiYesNo
BluetoothYesYes
Internal storage8 GB16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs10
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—20,000 h
Design & noise
Weight0.73 kg0.9 kg
ColoursWhiteBlue
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare