How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs Osmo FlixPro

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs Mavura Osmo FlixPro

What Luma 400 tragbarer HD does better (0) and where Osmo FlixPro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
0 advantages
vs
Mavura Osmo FlixPro
Mavura · 2026Osmo FlixPro
3 advantages≈ US$130
3.0Picture4.3

Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than Osmo FlixPro?

Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Osmo FlixPro better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. Audio outputNo · Luma 400 tragbarer HD: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:1—
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life3,500 h—
Design & noise
ColoursBlack, WhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare