- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs PPR F260-5026KE
Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs Peaq PPR F260-5026KE
What Luma 400 tragbarer HD does better (1) and where PPR F260-5026KE wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Picture4.7
Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than PPR F260-5026KE?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:1 vs 1,200:12.9×
Why is PPR F260-5026KE better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life3,500 h vs 30,000 h8.6×
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 240 lm+20%
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Audio outputNo · Luma 400 tragbarer HD: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 240 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,500:1 | 1,200:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | — | 100″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 3,500 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 1.2 kg |
| Colours | Black, White | White |
Related comparisons
vs
Epson Lifestudio Flex EF-72vsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
Optoma Photon GovsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
Optoma ML750ivsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
Xiaomi Cube2 ProvsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
XGIMI NovavsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
InFocus Quantum LED Apex MastervsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD