- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs NeoPix 256
Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs Philips NeoPix 256
What Luma 400 tragbarer HD does better (1) and where NeoPix 256 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
3.0Picture5.2
Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than NeoPix 256?
- Light source life3,500 h vs 1,000 h3.5×
Why is NeoPix 256 better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 250 lm+25%
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,500:1 | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 3,500 h | 1,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | Black, White | White, Silver, Grey |
Related comparisons
vs
Epson Lifestudio Flex EF-72vsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
Optoma Photon GovsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
Optoma ML750ivsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
Xiaomi Cube2 ProvsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
XGIMI NovavsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
InFocus Quantum LED Apex MastervsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD