How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs Renoir

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs Prixton Renoir

What Luma 400 tragbarer HD does better (1) and where Renoir wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
1 advantage
vs
Prixton Renoir
Prixton · 2026Renoir
4 advantages≈ US$180
3.0Picture5.0

Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than Renoir?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:1 vs 1,000:13.5×

Why is Renoir better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Light source life3,500 h vs 30,000 h8.6×
  3. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 280 lm+40%
  4. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Prixton RenoirPrixton Renoir≈ US$180
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm280 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:11,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—4.43 m
Largest image size—120″
Smart & streaming
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version—1.4
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life3,500 h30,000 h
Design & noise
ColoursBlack, WhiteWhite, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare