How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs M1E Max

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs ViewSonic M1E Max

What Luma 400 tragbarer HD does better (0) and where M1E Max wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
0 advantages
vs
ViewSonic M1E Max
ViewSonic · 2025M1E Max
6.8Score
5 advantages≈ US$540
Higher score
3.0Picture5.0

Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than M1E Max?

Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is M1E Max better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Light source life3,500 h vs 30,000 h8.6×
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:1 vs 120,000:134.3×
  4. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  5. Audio outputNo · Luma 400 tragbarer HD: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

ViewSonic M1E MaxViewSonic M1E Max≈ US$5406.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:1120,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size—150″
Lens shift—None
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—6 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in battery—Yes
Light source life3,500 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—25 dB
Weight—1.8 kg
Width—220 mm
Height—125 mm
Depth—190 mm
ColoursBlack, WhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare