How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs MoGo

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs XGIMI MoGo

What Luma 400 tragbarer HD does better (0) and where MoGo wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
0 advantages
vs
XGIMI MoGo
XGIMI · 2026MoGo
4 advantages≈ US$930
3.0Picture7.4

Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than MoGo?

Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is MoGo better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 450 lm2.2×
  2. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. Light source life3,500 h vs 25,000 h7.1×
  4. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

XGIMI MoGoXGIMI MoGo≈ US$930
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm450 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:1—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life3,500 h25,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—1.32 kg
ColoursBlack, WhiteGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare