How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 500 vs Multipic 6.1

Kodak Luma 500 vs Overmax Multipic 6.1

What Luma 500 does better (0) and where Multipic 6.1 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 500
Kodak · 2026Luma 500
4.6Score
0 advantages≈ US$650
Higher score
vs
Overmax Multipic 6.1
Overmax · 2026Multipic 6.1
1 advantage≈ US$580
4.4Setup & placement4.4

Why is Luma 500 better than Multipic 6.1?

Luma 500 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Multipic 6.1 better than Luma 500?

  1. Light source life500 h vs 7,000 h14×
Specifications

Side by side

Kodak Luma 500Kodak Luma 500≈ US$6504.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)400:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio0.57:11.5:1
Throw typeShort throw (0.4–1.0:1)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image1.26 m3.32 m
Lens shiftNoneNone
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TVAndroid (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Chromecast built-inYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life500 h7,000 h
Design & noise
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare