How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 500 vs MoGo

Kodak Luma 500 vs XGIMI MoGo

What Luma 500 does better (0) and where MoGo wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 500
Kodak · 2026Luma 500
4.6Score
0 advantages≈ US$650
Higher score
vs
XGIMI MoGo
XGIMI · 2026MoGo
2 advantages≈ US$930
3.3Picture7.4

Why is Luma 500 better than MoGo?

Luma 500 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is MoGo better than Luma 500?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 450 lm3×
  2. Light source life500 h vs 25,000 h50×
Specifications

Side by side

Kodak Luma 500Kodak Luma 500≈ US$6504.6
XGIMI MoGoXGIMI MoGo≈ US$930
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm450 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)400:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio0.57:1—
Throw typeShort throw (0.4–1.0:1)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image1.26 m—
Lens shiftNone—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TV—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYes—
Chromecast built-inYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life500 h25,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—1.32 kg
ColoursBlackGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare