How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Apollo vs ML1050ST+

Nebula Apollo vs Optoma ML1050ST+

What Apollo does better (0) and where ML1050ST+ wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Nebula Apollo
Nebula · 2019Apollo
0 advantages≈ US$240
vs
Optoma ML1050ST+
Optoma · 2019ML1050ST+
8.6Score
3 advantages
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

ApolloML1050ST+
65 × 13165112 × 57123
ApolloML1050ST+Difference
Height131 mm57 mm+74 mm
Width65 mm112 mm−47 mm
Depth65 mm123 mm−58 mm
Weight0.6 kg0.4 kg+0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Apollo better than ML1050ST+?

Apollo has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is ML1050ST+ better than Apollo?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 1,000 lm5×
  2. Fan noise30 dB vs 22 dB+36%
  3. Weight0.58 kg vs 0.42 kg+38%
Specifications

Side by side

Nebula ApolloNebula Apollo≈ US$240
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Native panel resolution—1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—20,000:1
HDR support—No
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—85 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.39:10.8:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Short throw (0.4–1.0:1)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.08 m1.77 m
Largest image size—100″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version—1.4
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—Yes
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYes—
Power consumption—77 W
Light source life—20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB22 dB
Weight0.58 kg0.42 kg
Width65 mm112 mm
Height131 mm57 mm
Depth65 mm123 mm
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare