- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Apollo vs NeoPix 120
Nebula Apollo vs Philips NeoPix 120
What Apollo does better (2) and where NeoPix 120 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
ApolloNeoPix 120
| Apollo | NeoPix 120 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 131 mm | 102 mm | +29 mm |
| Width | 65 mm | 225 mm | −160 mm |
| Depth | 65 mm | 190 mm | −125 mm |
| Weight | 0.6 kg | 0.8 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Apollo better than NeoPix 120?
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · NeoPix 120: No
- Weight0.58 kg vs 0.85 kg+47%
Why is NeoPix 120 better than Apollo?
NeoPix 120 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.39:1 | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.08 m | 3.25 m |
| Largest image size | — | 65″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | — | 42 W |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.58 kg | 0.85 kg |
| Width | 65 mm | 225 mm |
| Height | 131 mm | 102 mm |
| Depth | 65 mm | 190 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
