- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Apollo vs NeoPix Ace
Nebula Apollo vs Philips NeoPix Ace
What Apollo does better (1) and where NeoPix Ace wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Apollo better than NeoPix Ace?
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · NeoPix Ace: No
Why is NeoPix Ace better than Apollo?
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 4,200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.39:1 | 1.4:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.08 m | 3.1 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 20″ |
| Largest image size | — | 120″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | Yes |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.58 kg | — |
| Width | 65 mm | — |
| Height | 131 mm | — |
| Depth | 65 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Silver, Black |
