How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Apollo vs M1

Nebula Apollo vs ViewSonic M1

What Apollo does better (2) and where M1 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Nebula Apollo
Nebula · 2019Apollo
2 advantages≈ US$240
vs
ViewSonic M1
ViewSonic · 2018M1
5.5Score
1 advantage
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

ApolloM1
65 × 13165148 × 41126
ApolloM1Difference
Height131 mm41 mm+90 mm
Width65 mm148 mm−83 mm
Depth65 mm126 mm−61 mm
Weight0.6 kg0.8 kg−0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Apollo better than M1?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionYes · M1: No
  2. Weight0.58 kg vs 0.8 kg+38%

Why is M1 better than Apollo?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 250 lm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Nebula ApolloNebula Apollo≈ US$240
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution—854 × 480 (480p)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—120,000:1
HDR support—No
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.39:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.08 m2.66 m
Smallest image size—24″
Largest image size—100″
Lens shift—None
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—6 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYesYes
Power consumption—55 W
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB—
Weight0.58 kg0.8 kg
Width65 mm148 mm
Height131 mm41 mm
Depth65 mm126 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare