How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TriVision Ultra vs GamePix 900

NexiGo TriVision Ultra vs Philips GamePix 900

What TriVision Ultra does better (4) and where GamePix 900 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

NexiGo TriVision Ultra
NexiGo · 2025TriVision Ultra
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ US$1,100
Higher score
vs
Philips GamePix 900
Philips · 2025GamePix 900
0 advantages≈ US$780
6.0Picture4.1

Why is TriVision Ultra better than GamePix 900?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,600 lm vs 1,000 lm2.6×
  2. Largest image size300″ vs 120″2.5×
  3. HDMI inputs3 vs 13×
  4. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · GamePix 900: No

Why is GamePix 900 better than TriVision Ultra?

GamePix 900 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

NexiGo TriVision UltraNexiGo TriVision Ultra≈ US$1,1008.3
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,600 lm1,000 lm
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10+, HDR10, Dolby Vision—
Dolby VisionYes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Lens & placement
Largest image size300″120″
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)30 W—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs31
HDMI eARCYes—
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—2.3 kg
Width—238 mm
Height—115 mm
Depth—215 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare