- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- PV800 Pro vs NeoPix 122
OSCAL PV800 Pro vs Philips NeoPix 122
What PV800 Pro does better (3) and where NeoPix 122 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is PV800 Pro better than NeoPix 122?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Largest image size200″ vs 65″3.1×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Why is NeoPix 122 better than PV800 Pro?
- Built-in speakers (total output)8 W vs 10 W+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 100 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 1,400 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 4,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.25 m |
| Smallest image size | 40″ | 65″ |
| Largest image size | 200″ | 65″ |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 8 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 1.4 | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 42 W |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | — |
| Weight | — | 0.85 kg |
| Width | — | 225 mm |
| Height | — | 102 mm |
| Depth | — | 190 mm |
| Colours | Silver, White, Grey | Black |
