- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- PPR F260-5026KE vs PT-1
Peaq PPR F260-5026KE vs Rollei PT-1
What PPR F260-5026KE does better (4) and where PT-1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Picture3.5
3.3Setup & placement6.5
Why is PPR F260-5026KE better than PT-1?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)240 lm vs 220 lm+9%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Weight1.2 kg vs 1.5 kg+25%
Why is PT-1 better than PPR F260-5026KE?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,200:1 vs 5,000:14.2×
- Largest image size100″ vs 200″2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 240 lm | 220 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,200:1 | 5,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.44:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.19 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 100″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1.2 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Colours | White | Grey |
