- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- GamePix 900 vs ProPix 860
Philips GamePix 900 vs Philips ProPix 860
What GamePix 900 does better (2) and where ProPix 860 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Picture3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
GamePix 900ProPix 860
| GamePix 900 | ProPix 860 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115 mm | 99 mm | +16 mm |
| Width | 238 mm | 302 mm | −64 mm |
| Depth | 215 mm | 218 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 4.2 kg | −1.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GamePix 900 better than ProPix 860?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Weight2.3 kg vs 4.2 kg+83%
Why is ProPix 860 better than GamePix 900?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,000 lm vs 2,600 lm2.6×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,000 lm | 2,600 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,500:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.49:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.3 m |
| Largest image size | 120″ | — |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 5 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 4.2 kg |
| Width | 238 mm | 302 mm |
| Height | 115 mm | 99 mm |
| Depth | 215 mm | 218 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
