- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- GamePix 900 vs LSD300W-ST
Philips GamePix 900 vs ViewSonic LSD300W-ST
What GamePix 900 does better (3) and where LSD300W-ST wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Picture3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
GamePix 900LSD300W-ST
| GamePix 900 | LSD300W-ST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115 mm | 115 mm | = |
| Width | 238 mm | 294 mm | −56 mm |
| Depth | 215 mm | 237 mm | −22 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.8 kg | −0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GamePix 900 better than LSD300W-ST?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.85 kg+24%
Why is LSD300W-ST better than GamePix 900?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,000 lm vs 3,300 lm3.3×
- Light source life30,000 h vs 60,000 h2×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · GamePix 900: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,000 lm | 3,300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.49:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 1.08 m |
| Largest image size | 120″ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 60,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 32 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 27 dB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.85 kg |
| Width | 238 mm | 294 mm |
| Height | 115 mm | 115 mm |
| Depth | 215 mm | 237 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
