- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- GamePix 900 vs PX700HDHE
Philips GamePix 900 vs ViewSonic PX700HDHE
What GamePix 900 does better (3) and where PX700HDHE wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Picture4.2
Why is GamePix 900 better than PX700HDHE?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life30,000 h vs 6,000 h5×
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.4 kg+4%
Why is PX700HDHE better than GamePix 900?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,000 lm vs 3,700 lm3.7×
- Largest image size120″ vs 300″2.5×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,000 lm | 3,700 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 22,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.49:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.64:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.3 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 30″ |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 300 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 6,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 31 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 27 dB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Width | 238 mm | — |
| Height | 115 mm | — |
| Depth | 215 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | White |
