How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. GamePix 900 vs K300s

Philips GamePix 900 vs Yaber K300s

What GamePix 900 does better (3) and where K300s wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips GamePix 900
Philips · 2025GamePix 900
3 advantages≈ US$780
vs
Yaber K300s
Yaber · 2024K300s
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$1,000
Higher score
4.1Picture3.2

Why is GamePix 900 better than K300s?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
  3. Largest image size120″ vs 100″+20%

Why is K300s better than GamePix 900?

  1. Ethernet (LAN)No · GamePix 900: Yes
  2. Weight2.3 kg vs 1.8 kg+28%
Specifications

Side by side

Yaber K300sYaber K300s≈ US$1,0007.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLEDLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,000 lm1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,500:1
Motion interpolation (MEMC)—Yes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)—2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.21 m
Largest image size120″100″
Optical zoom—2×
Lens shift—None
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—30 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—27 dB
Weight2.3 kg1.8 kg
Width238 mm—
Height115 mm—
Depth215 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare