- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 120 vs NeoPix 200
Philips NeoPix 120 vs Philips NeoPix 200
What NeoPix 120 does better (3) and where NeoPix 200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Setup & placement2.0
Why is NeoPix 120 better than NeoPix 200?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- Weight0.85 kg vs 1.35 kg+59%
- Largest image size65″ vs 60″+8%
Why is NeoPix 200 better than NeoPix 120?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.47:1 | 1.35:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.25 m | 2.99 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 24″ |
| Largest image size | 65″ | 60″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 42 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.85 kg | 1.35 kg |
| Width | 225 mm | — |
| Height | 102 mm | — |
| Depth | 190 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver, Black, White |
