- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 113 vs NeoPix 120
Philips NeoPix 113 vs Philips NeoPix 120
What NeoPix 113 does better (1) and where NeoPix 120 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is NeoPix 113 better than NeoPix 120?
- Weight0.4 kg vs 0.85 kg2.1×
Why is NeoPix 120 better than NeoPix 113?
- Built-in speakers (total output)3 W vs 10 W3.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.47:1 | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.25 m | 3.25 m |
| Smallest image size | 65″ | — |
| Largest image size | 65″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 42 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.4 kg | 0.85 kg |
| Width | — | 225 mm |
| Height | — | 102 mm |
| Depth | — | 190 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
