- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 120 vs 58BHD2500
Philips NeoPix 120 vs Salora 58BHD2500
What NeoPix 120 does better (2) and where 58BHD2500 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Noise, lifetime & portability9.8
Why is NeoPix 120 better than 58BHD2500?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 1,500:12×
- Audio outputYes · 58BHD2500: No
Why is 58BHD2500 better than NeoPix 120?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life30,000 h vs 50,000 h+67%
- Largest image size65″ vs 200″3.1×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 2,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.47:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.25 m | — |
| Smallest image size | — | 50″ |
| Largest image size | 65″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 42 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | 0.85 kg | — |
| Width | 225 mm | — |
| Height | 102 mm | — |
| Depth | 190 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | White |
