How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 122 vs NeoPix 330

Philips NeoPix 122 vs Philips NeoPix 330

What NeoPix 122 does better (1) and where NeoPix 330 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 122
Philips · 2024NeoPix 122
4.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$230
vs
Philips NeoPix 330
Philips · 2023NeoPix 330
7.6Score
3 advantages
Higher score
2.2Picture5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix 122NeoPix 330
225 × 102190216 × 93246
NeoPix 122NeoPix 330Difference
Height102 mm93 mm+9 mm
Width225 mm216 mm+9 mm
Depth190 mm246 mm−56 mm
Weight0.8 kg1.2 kg−0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix 122 better than NeoPix 330?

  1. Weight0.85 kg vs 1.2 kg+41%

Why is NeoPix 330 better than NeoPix 122?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm vs 250 lm2.5×
  2. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 122Philips NeoPix 122≈ US$2304.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:11.4:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m3.1 m
Smallest image size65″—
Largest image size65″—
Autofocus—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
AirPlay—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption42 W—
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight0.85 kg1.2 kg
Width225 mm216 mm
Height102 mm93 mm
Depth190 mm246 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare