How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 122 vs SCVP500

Philips NeoPix 122 vs Schneider SCVP500

What NeoPix 122 does better (2) and where SCVP500 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 122
Philips · 2024NeoPix 122
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$230
Higher score
vs
Schneider SCVP500
Schneider · 2025SCVP500
2 advantages≈ US$280
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix 122SCVP500
225 × 102190138 × 122159
NeoPix 122SCVP500Difference
Height102 mm122 mm−20 mm
Width225 mm138 mm+87 mm
Depth190 mm159 mm+31 mm
Weight0.8 kg1.1 kg−0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix 122 better than SCVP500?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 10,000 h3×
  2. Weight0.85 kg vs 1.1 kg+29%

Why is SCVP500 better than NeoPix 122?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 122Philips NeoPix 122≈ US$2304.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—4,300 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m2.66 m
Smallest image size65″—
Largest image size65″—
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version—1.4
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption42 W—
Light source life30,000 h10,000 h
Design & noise
Weight0.85 kg1.1 kg
Width225 mm138 mm
Height102 mm122 mm
Depth190 mm159 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare