- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 140 vs L1
Philips NeoPix 140 vs Yaber L1
What NeoPix 140 does better (2) and where L1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
NeoPix 140L1
| NeoPix 140 | L1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 142 mm | 118 mm | +24 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 160 mm | −92 mm |
| Depth | 74 mm | 125 mm | −51 mm |
| Weight | 0.3 kg | 1 kg | −0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NeoPix 140 better than L1?
- Weight0.3 kg vs 0.96 kg3.2×
- Audio outputYes · L1: No
Why is L1 better than NeoPix 140?
- Resolution (on screen)1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Native panel resolution1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1024 × 768 (XGA) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 65″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 65 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.3 kg | 0.96 kg |
| Width | 68 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 142 mm | 118 mm |
| Depth | 74 mm | 125 mm |
| Colours | — | White, Black |
