- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 200 vs N1
Philips NeoPix 200 vs Strong N1
What NeoPix 200 does better (4) and where N1 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
4.7Picture2.4
Why is NeoPix 200 better than N1?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 150 lm+33%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
Why is N1 better than NeoPix 200?
- Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
- Weight1.35 kg vs 0.4 kg3.4×
- Largest image size60″ vs 100″+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 24″ | 30″ |
| Largest image size | 60″ | 100″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 30 dB |
| Weight | 1.35 kg | 0.4 kg |
| Colours | Silver, Black, White | White, Grey |
