How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 160 vs NeoPix 230

Philips NeoPix 160 vs Philips NeoPix 230

What NeoPix 160 does better (1) and where NeoPix 230 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 160
Philips · 2025NeoPix 160
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$190
vs
Philips NeoPix 230
Philips · 2024NeoPix 230
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ US$350
Higher score
2.4Picture2.4
2.4Smart features & sound3.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix 160NeoPix 230
207 × 147171239 × 187140
NeoPix 160NeoPix 230Difference
Height147 mm187 mm−40 mm
Width207 mm239 mm−32 mm
Depth171 mm140 mm+31 mm
Weight1.2 kg2.5 kg−1.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix 160 better than NeoPix 230?

  1. Weight1.23 kg vs 2.5 kg2×

Why is NeoPix 230 better than NeoPix 160?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 10 W2×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 160Philips NeoPix 160≈ US$1903.6
Philips NeoPix 230Philips NeoPix 230≈ US$3504.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLED—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—48″
Largest image size—80″
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TV—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)YesYes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Chromecast built-inYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.23 kg2.5 kg
Width207 mm239 mm
Height147 mm187 mm
Depth171 mm140 mm
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare