How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 150 vs NeoPix 230

Philips NeoPix 150 vs Philips NeoPix 230

What NeoPix 150 does better (1) and where NeoPix 230 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 150
Philips · 2025NeoPix 150
1 advantage≈ US$160
vs
Philips NeoPix 230
Philips · 2024NeoPix 230
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ US$350
Higher score
2.2Picture2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix 150NeoPix 230
126 × 208144239 × 187140
NeoPix 150NeoPix 230Difference
Height208 mm187 mm+21 mm
Width126 mm239 mm−113 mm
Depth144 mm140 mm+4 mm
Weight1.8 kg2.5 kg−0.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix 150 better than NeoPix 230?

  1. Weight1.85 kg vs 2.5 kg+35%

Why is NeoPix 230 better than NeoPix 150?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · NeoPix 150: Yes
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 10 W+67%
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 230Philips NeoPix 230≈ US$3504.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m2.66 m
Smallest image size—48″
Largest image size—80″
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)6 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.85 kg2.5 kg
Width126 mm239 mm
Height208 mm187 mm
Depth144 mm140 mm
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare