How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 250 vs MIRA 1

Philips NeoPix 250 vs Strong MIRA 1

What NeoPix 250 does better (3) and where MIRA 1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 250
Philips · 2025NeoPix 250
3.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$260
vs
Strong MIRA 1
Strong · 2025MIRA 1
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$190
Higher score
2.2Picture2.4
2.9Smart features & sound5.5

Why is NeoPix 250 better than MIRA 1?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 1,500:12×
  3. Largest image size200″ vs 150″+33%

Why is MIRA 1 better than NeoPix 250?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 300 lm+20%
  2. Audio outputNo · NeoPix 250: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 250Philips NeoPix 250≈ US$2603.6
Strong MIRA 1Strong MIRA 1≈ US$1904.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K input only (downscaled)—
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm300 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:11,500:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.31:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.9 m—
Smallest image size80″40″
Largest image size200″150″
Lens shift—None
AutofocusYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)6 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TVGoogle TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)YesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-inYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—60 W
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—55 dB
Weight2.5 kg2.5 kg
Width239 mm—
Height188 mm—
Depth141 mm—
ColoursWhiteGrey, Green
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare