- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 250 vs Pro U6
Philips NeoPix 250 vs Yaber Pro U6
What NeoPix 250 does better (2) and where Pro U6 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.2Picture2.9
Why is NeoPix 250 better than Pro U6?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 5 W+20%
Why is Pro U6 better than NeoPix 250?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 800 lm3.2×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · NeoPix 250: Yes
- Largest image size200″ vs 300″+50%
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.22 kg+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K input only (downscaled) | — |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.31:1 | 1.54:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.9 m | 3.41 m |
| Smallest image size | 80″ | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 200″ | 300″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.22 kg |
| Width | 239 mm | — |
| Height | 188 mm | — |
| Depth | 141 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Grey |
