How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 320 vs NeoPix 330

Philips NeoPix 320 vs Philips NeoPix 330

What NeoPix 320 does better (0) and where NeoPix 330 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 320
Philips · 2022NeoPix 320
7.6Score
0 advantages≈ US$410
vs
Philips NeoPix 330
Philips · 2023NeoPix 330
7.6Score
1 advantage
5.5Picture5.5
8.6Smart features & sound8.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix 320NeoPix 330
216 × 93246216 × 93246
NeoPix 320NeoPix 330Difference
Height93 mm93 mm=
Width216 mm216 mm=
Depth246 mm246 mm=
Weight1.2 kg1.2 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix 320 better than NeoPix 330?

NeoPix 320 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is NeoPix 330 better than NeoPix 320?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 320Philips NeoPix 320≈ US$4107.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.4:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m3.1 m
Autofocus—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlayYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.2 kg1.2 kg
Width216 mm216 mm
Height93 mm93 mm
Depth246 mm246 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare