How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 320 vs NeoPix Ultra One+

Philips NeoPix 320 vs Philips NeoPix Ultra One+

What NeoPix 320 does better (0) and where NeoPix Ultra One+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 320
Philips · 2022NeoPix 320
7.6Score
0 advantages≈ US$410
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix Ultra One+
Philips · 2022NeoPix Ultra One+
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$290
8.6Smart features & sound7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix 320NeoPix Ultra One+
216 × 93246220 × 90170
NeoPix 320NeoPix Ultra One+Difference
Height93 mm90 mm+3 mm
Width216 mm220 mm−4 mm
Depth246 mm170 mm+76 mm
Weight1.2 kg1.2 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix 320 better than NeoPix Ultra One+?

NeoPix 320 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is NeoPix Ultra One+ better than NeoPix 320?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 320Philips NeoPix 320≈ US$4107.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.4:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m3.1 m
Largest image size—80″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlayYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.2 kg1.2 kg
Width216 mm220 mm
Height93 mm90 mm
Depth246 mm170 mm
ColoursBlackSilver, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare