How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 320 vs PicoPix Micro 2TV

Philips NeoPix 320 vs Philips PicoPix Micro 2TV

What NeoPix 320 does better (4) and where PicoPix Micro 2TV wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 320
Philips · 2022NeoPix 320
7.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$410
Higher score
vs
Philips PicoPix Micro 2TV
Philips · 2021PicoPix Micro 2TV
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$390
5.5Picture2.5

Why is NeoPix 320 better than PicoPix Micro 2TV?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 200 lm+25%
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 600:15×
  4. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)

Why is PicoPix Micro 2TV better than NeoPix 320?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 320Philips NeoPix 320≈ US$4107.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)DLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1600:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m2.66 m
Largest image size—100″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
AirPlayYes—
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in battery—Yes
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.2 kg—
Width216 mm—
Height93 mm—
Depth246 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare