How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 520 vs K3

Philips NeoPix 520 vs Yaber K3

What NeoPix 520 does better (2) and where K3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 520
Philips · 2022NeoPix 520
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$480
vs
Yaber K3
Yaber · 2024K3
9.2Score
5 advantages≈ US$500
Higher score
2.2Setup & placement8.1
6.4Smart features & sound9.4

Why is NeoPix 520 better than K3?

  1. Weight2.4 kg vs 5.1 kg2.1×
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is K3 better than NeoPix 520?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)14 W vs 36 W2.6×
  2. AutofocusNo · NeoPix 520: Yes
  3. Automatic keystone correctionNo · NeoPix 520: Yes
  4. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 15,000:15×
  5. Largest image size100″ vs 200″2×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 520Philips NeoPix 520≈ US$4808.6
Yaber K3Yaber K3≈ US$5009.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—1,600 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:115,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.43:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.17 m2.66 m
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size100″200″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)14 W36 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Google TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption100 W—
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Weight2.4 kg5.1 kg
Width274 mm—
Height107 mm—
Depth294 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare