- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- PicoPix Micro+ vs Mini XS01
Philips PicoPix Micro+ vs Xiaomi Mini XS01
What PicoPix Micro+ does better (1) and where Mini XS01 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Picture4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
PicoPix Micro+Mini XS01
| PicoPix Micro+ | Mini XS01 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 34 mm | 86 mm | −52 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 165 mm | −89 mm |
| Depth | 74 mm | 122 mm | −48 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PicoPix Micro+ better than Mini XS01?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
Why is Mini XS01 better than PicoPix Micro+?
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 200 lm+33%
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Largest image size70″ vs 120″+71%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 600:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | — |
| Smallest image size | — | 120″ |
| Largest image size | 70″ | 120″ |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Own / Linux platform | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 40 dB |
| Weight | 0.21 kg | — |
| Width | 76 mm | 165 mm |
| Height | 34 mm | 86 mm |
| Depth | 74 mm | 122 mm |
| Colours | Black | Yellow |
