- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- VPL-GTZ380 vs VPL-XW7000ES
Sony VPL-GTZ380 vs Sony VPL-XW7000ES
What VPL-GTZ380 does better (2) and where VPL-XW7000ES wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Picture7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
VPL-GTZ380VPL-XW7000ES
| VPL-GTZ380 | VPL-XW7000ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 262 mm | 210 mm | +52 mm |
| Width | 560 mm | 460 mm | +100 mm |
| Depth | 760 mm | 517 mm | +243 mm |
| Weight | 51 kg | 14 kg | +37 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VPL-GTZ380 better than VPL-XW7000ES?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)10,000 lm vs 3,200 lm3.1×
- Resolution (on screen)4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Why is VPL-XW7000ES better than VPL-GTZ380?
- Weight51 kg vs 14 kg3.6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| 4K method | — | Native 4K |
| Display technology | — | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 10,000 lm | 3,200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 16,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.35:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.84:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.99 m |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Lens shift | — | Vertical and horizontal |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB-C video input | Yes | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 420 W |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 26 dB |
| Weight | 51 kg | 14 kg |
| Width | 560 mm | 460 mm |
| Height | 262 mm | 210 mm |
| Depth | 760 mm | 517 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
