How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TX-177 vs Apollo P20

Technaxx TX-177 vs ULTIMEA Apollo P20

What TX-177 does better (1) and where Apollo P20 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Technaxx TX-177
Technaxx · 2022TX-177
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ US$130
Higher score
vs
ULTIMEA Apollo P20
ULTIMEA · 2022Apollo P20
6.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$120
5.6Setup & placement2.8
7.8Noise, lifetime & portability8.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

TX-177Apollo P20
187 × 96234190 × 23085
TX-177Apollo P20Difference
Height96 mm230 mm−134 mm
Width187 mm190 mm−3 mm
Depth234 mm85 mm+149 mm
Weight1.4 kg1.2 kg+0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TX-177 better than Apollo P20?

  1. Largest image size200″ vs 120″+67%

Why is Apollo P20 better than TX-177?

  1. Light source life40,000 h vs 100,000 h2.5×
  2. Weight1.36 kg vs 1.2 kg+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Technaxx TX-177Technaxx TX-177≈ US$1306.7
ULTIMEA Apollo P20ULTIMEA Apollo P20≈ US$1206.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—300 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.5:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.32 m
Smallest image size50″120″
Largest image size200″120″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W3 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption70 W—
Light source life40,000 h100,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—30 dB
Weight1.36 kg1.2 kg
Width187 mm190 mm
Height96 mm230 mm
Depth234 mm85 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare