- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- C200 vs Apollo
Acer C200 vs Nebula Apollo
What C200 does better (2) and where Apollo wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
C200Apollo
| C200 | Apollo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 30 mm | 131 mm | −101 mm |
| Width | 110 mm | 65 mm | +45 mm |
| Depth | 120 mm | 65 mm | +55 mm |
| Weight | 0.4 kg | 0.6 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C200 better than Apollo?
- Fan noise29 dB vs 30 dB+3%
- Weight0.35 kg vs 0.58 kg+66%
Why is Apollo better than C200?
Apollo has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 200 lm |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.15:1 | 1.39:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.55 m | 3.08 m |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | Yes |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 29 dB | 30 dB |
| Weight | 0.35 kg | 0.58 kg |
| Width | 110 mm | 65 mm |
| Height | 30 mm | 131 mm |
| Depth | 120 mm | 65 mm |
