- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF81 vs PV12a
Acer QF81 vs AOpen PV12a
What QF81 does better (3) and where PV12a wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is QF81 better than PV12a?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Wi-FiYes · PV12a: No
Why is PV12a better than QF81?
- Light source life800 h vs 20,000 h25×
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
- Audio outputNo · QF81: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 800 lm | 800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 5,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.3:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.88 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 30″ |
| Largest image size | — | 100″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 2 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Power consumption | — | 30 W |
| Light source life | 800 h | 20,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 29 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | — | 0.4 kg |
| Width | — | 115 mm |
| Height | — | 115 mm |
| Depth | — | 36 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
