- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs TH575i
Acer QT12 vs BenQ TH575i
What QT12 does better (2) and where TH575i wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than TH575i?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 3,800 lm+71%
- Light source life6,500 h vs 6,000 h+8%
Why is TH575i better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 3,800 lm |
| Native contrast ratio | — | 15,000:1 |
| Colour gamut (Rec.709) | — | 88% |
| Gaming | ||
| Input lag | — | 16.7 ms |
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.49:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.64:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.3 m |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.1× |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 295 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 6,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 10,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 2.3 kg |
| Width | — | 296 mm |
| Height | — | 120 mm |
| Depth | — | 237 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
