- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs UHZ68LV
Acer QT12 vs Optoma UHZ68LV
What QT12 does better (1) and where UHZ68LV wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than UHZ68LV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 5,000 lm+30%
Why is UHZ68LV better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 20,000 h3.1×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 33×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 5,000 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.92:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | — | 302″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | — | Vertical |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 8 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 3 |
| HDMI eARC | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 31 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 25 dB |
| Colours | White | Black |
