How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. EAZZE D1R vs NeoPix 250

Aurzen EAZZE D1R vs Philips NeoPix 250

What EAZZE D1R does better (3) and where NeoPix 250 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen EAZZE D1R
Aurzen · 2025EAZZE D1R
4.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$185
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 250
Philips · 2025NeoPix 250
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$260
2.3Picture2.2
4.3Smart features & sound2.9

Why is EAZZE D1R better than NeoPix 250?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)280 lm vs 250 lm+12%
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 6 W+67%
  3. Audio outputYes · NeoPix 250: No

Why is NeoPix 250 better than EAZZE D1R?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
Specifications

Side by side

Aurzen EAZZE D1RAurzen EAZZE D1R≈ US$1854.7
Philips NeoPix 250Philips NeoPix 250≈ US$2603.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)—
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)—
4K method—4K input only (downscaled)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)280 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.28:11.31:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.83 m2.9 m
Smallest image size60″80″
Largest image size200″200″
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W6 W
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital PlusYes—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformOwn / Linux platformGoogle TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlayYes—
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise40 dB—
Weight—2.5 kg
Width—239 mm
Height—188 mm
Depth—141 mm
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare