- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EAZZE D1R vs NeoPix 150
Aurzen EAZZE D1R vs Philips NeoPix 150
What EAZZE D1R does better (3) and where NeoPix 150 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Picture2.2
Why is EAZZE D1R better than NeoPix 150?
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · NeoPix 150: No
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)280 lm vs 250 lm+12%
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 6 W+67%
Why is NeoPix 150 better than EAZZE D1R?
NeoPix 150 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 280 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.28:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.83 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | — |
| Largest image size | 200″ | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 6 W |
| Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Own / Linux platform | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 40 dB | — |
| Weight | — | 1.85 kg |
| Width | — | 126 mm |
| Height | — | 208 mm |
| Depth | — | 144 mm |
