- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs EAZZE D1R
Acer QT12 vs Aurzen EAZZE D1R
What QT12 does better (1) and where EAZZE D1R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than EAZZE D1R?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 280 lm23.2×
Why is EAZZE D1R better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 280 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.28:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.83 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 60″ |
| Largest image size | — | 200″ |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Own / Linux platform |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| AirPlay | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 40 dB |
| Colours | White | — |
