How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. EAZZE D1R vs FLIK X10

Aurzen EAZZE D1R vs Kodak FLIK X10

What EAZZE D1R does better (4) and where FLIK X10 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen EAZZE D1R
Aurzen · 2025EAZZE D1R
4.7Score
4 advantages≈ US$185
Higher score
vs
Kodak FLIK X10
Kodak · 2025FLIK X10
0 advantages≈ US$240
9.2Setup & placement5.2

Why is EAZZE D1R better than FLIK X10?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionYes · FLIK X10: No
  2. Audio outputYes · FLIK X10: No
  3. Largest image size200″ vs 120″+67%
  4. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 800:1+25%

Why is FLIK X10 better than EAZZE D1R?

FLIK X10 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Aurzen EAZZE D1RAurzen EAZZE D1R≈ US$1854.7
Kodak FLIK X10Kodak FLIK X10≈ US$240
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)280 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—3,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1800:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.28:11.3:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.83 m2.88 m
Smallest image size60″40″
Largest image size200″120″
Lens shift—None
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital PlusYes—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformOwn / Linux platform—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
AirPlayYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise40 dB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare