How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZIP Tri-Fold vs N1S

Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold vs JMGO N1S

What ZIP Tri-Fold does better (0) and where N1S wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold
Aurzen · 2026ZIP Tri-Fold
0 advantages≈ US$1,000
vs
JMGO N1S
JMGO · 2024N1S
9.5Score
3 advantages≈ US$920
Higher score

Why is ZIP Tri-Fold better than N1S?

ZIP Tri-Fold has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is N1S better than ZIP Tri-Fold?

  1. Light source life5,000 h vs 30,000 h6×
  2. HDMI inputs0 vs 1
  3. Audio outputNo · ZIP Tri-Fold: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

JMGO N1SJMGO N1S≈ US$9209.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light source—Laser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—900 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)5,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,600:1
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Google TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Internal storage—32 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs01
HDMI version—2.1
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life5,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Weight—2 kg
ColoursGoldGrey, White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare