How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZIP Tri-Fold vs N1S Ultra

Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold vs JMGO N1S Ultra

What ZIP Tri-Fold does better (0) and where N1S Ultra wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold
Aurzen · 2026ZIP Tri-Fold
0 advantages≈ US$1,000
vs
JMGO N1S Ultra
JMGO · 2024N1S Ultra
9.5Score
0 advantages≈ US$1,150
Higher score

Why is ZIP Tri-Fold better than N1S Ultra?

ZIP Tri-Fold has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is N1S Ultra better than ZIP Tri-Fold?

N1S Ultra has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JMGO N1S UltraJMGO N1S Ultra≈ US$1,1509.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light source—RGB triple laser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—2,800 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)5,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,600:1
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10, Dolby Vision
Dolby Vision—Yes
Colour gamut (BT.2020)—110%
3D playback—Yes
Gaming
Game / low-latency mode—Yes
VRR / ALLM—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size—300″
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Automatic screen fit—Yes
Built-in stand / gimbal—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—20 W
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus—Yes
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Google TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs0—
HDMI version—2.1
HDMI eARC—Yes
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputNo—
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—180 W
Light source life5,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Weight—1 kg
ColoursGold—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare